Rush Limbaugh Isn’t the Only Media Misogynist
Rush Limbaugh apologized on Saturday for calling a Georgetown Law student a slut for testifying about contraception and starting a firestorm of outrage. Kirsten Powers says the liberals who led the charge need to start holding their own side accountable.
Yes, it’s true. Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Bill Maher, Matt Taibbi, and
Ed Schultz have been waging it for years with their misogynist outbursts. There
have been boycotts by people on the left who are outraged that these guys still
have jobs. Oh, wait. Sorry, that never happened.
Boycotts are reserved for people on the right like Rush Limbaugh, who finally
apologized
Saturday for calling a 30-year-old Georgetown Law student, Sandra Fluke, a
“slut” after she testified before congress about contraception. Limbaugh’s
apology was likely extracted to stop the departure of any more advertisers, who
were rightly under pressure from liberal groups outraged by the
comments.
Let it be shouted from the rooftops that Rush Limbaugh should not have called
Ms. Fluke a slut or, as he added later, a “prostitute” who should post her sex
tapes. It’s unlikely that his apology will assuage the people on a warpath for
his scalp, and after all, why should it? He spent days attacking a woman as a
slut and prostitute and refused to relent. Now because he doesn’t want to lose
advertisers, he apologizes. What’s in order is something more like groveling—and
of course a phone call to Ms. Fluke—if you ask me.
But if Limbaugh’s actions demand a boycott—and they do—then what about the
army of swine on the left?
During the 2008 election Ed Schultz said on his radio show that Sarah Palin
set off a “bimbo alert.” He called Laura Ingraham a “right-wing slut.”
(He later apologized.) He once even took to his blog to call yours truly a
“bimbo” for the offense of quoting him accurately in a New York Post
column.
Keith Olbermann has said that conservative commentator S.E. Cupp should have
been aborted by her parents, apparently because he finds her having opinions
offensive. He called Michelle Malkin a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick.” He
found it newsworthy to discuss Carrie Prejean’s breasts on his MSNBC show. His
solution for dealing with Hillary Clinton, who he thought should drop out of the
presidential race, was to find “somebody who can take her into a room and only he comes
out.” Olbermann now works for über-leftist and former Democratic vice
president Al Gore at Current TV.
Left-wing darling Matt Taibbi wrote on his blog in 2009, “When I read [Malkin’s] stuff, I
imagine her narrating her text, book-on-tape style, with a big, hairy set of
balls in her mouth.” In a Rolling Stone article about Secretary of State
Clinton, he referred to her “flabby arms.” When feminist writer Erica Jong criticized him
for it, he responded by referring to Jong as an “800-year old sex novelist.”
(Jong is almost 70, which apparently makes her an irrelevant human being.) In
Taibbi’s profile of Congresswoman and presidential candidate Michele Bachmann he
labeled her “batshit crazy.” (Oh, those “crazy” women with their hormones and
all.)
Chris Matthews’s sickening misogyny was made famous in 2008, when he
obsessively tore down Hillary Clinton for standing between Barack Obama and the
presidency, something that Matthews could not abide. Over the years he has
referred to the former first lady, senator and presidential candidate and
current secretary of state as a “she-devil,” “Nurse Ratched,” and “Madame
Defarge.” Matthews has also called Clinton “witchy,” “anti-male,” and “uppity”
and once claimed she won her Senate seat only because her “husband messed around.” He asked a guest if “being surrounded
by women” makes “a case for commander in chief—or does it make a case against
it?” At some point Matthews was shamed into sort of half apologizing to Clinton,
but then just picked up again with his sexist ramblings.
Matthews has wondered aloud whether Sarah Palin is even “capable of thinking”
and has called Bachmann a “balloon head” and said she was “lucky we still don’t have
literacy tests out there.” Democratic strategist Jehmu Greene, who is the former
president of the Women’s Media Center, told Fox News’ Megyn Kelly in 2011 that Matthews
“is a bully,
and his favorite target is women.” So why does he still have a show? What if his
favorite target was Jews? Or African-Americans?
But the grand pooh-bah of media misogyny is without a doubt Bill Maher—who
also happens to be a favorite of liberals—who has given $1 million to President
Obama’s super PAC. Maher has called Palin a “dumb twat” and dropped the C-word in describing the former Alaska governor. He called
Palin and Congresswoman Bachmann “boobs” and “two bimbos.” He said of the former vice-presidential candidate, “She is not a
mean girl. She is a crazy girl with mean ideas.” He recently made a joke about
Rick Santorum’s wife using a vibrator. Imagine now the same joke during the 2008 primary
with Michelle Obama’s name in it, and tell me that he would still have a job.
Maher said of a woman who was harassed while breast-feeding at an
Applebee’s, “Don't show me your tits!” as though a woman feeding her
child is trying to flash Maher. (Here’s a way to solve his problem: don’t stare
at a strangers’ breasts). Then, his coup de grâce: “And by the way, there is a
place where breasts and food do go together. It’s called Hooters!”
Liberals—you know, the
people who say they “fight for women”—comprise Maher’s audience, and a parade of
high-profile liberals make up his guest list. Yet have any of them confronted
him? Nope. That was left to Ann Coulter, who actually called Maher a misogynist
to his face, an opportunity that feminist icon Gloria Steinem
failed to take when she appeared on his show in 2011.
This is not to suggest that liberals—or feminists—never complain about
misogyny. Many feminist blogs now document attacks on women on the
left and the right, including Jezebel, Shakesville, and the
Women’s Media Center (which was cofounded by Steinem). But when it comes to
high-profile campaigns to hold these men accountable—such as that waged against
Limbaugh—the real fury seems reserved only for conservatives, while the men on
the left get a wink and a nod as long as they are carrying water for the liberal
cause.
After all, if Limbaugh’s outburst is part of the “war on women,” then what is
the routine misogyny of liberal media men?
It’s time for some equal-opportunity accountability. Without it, the fight
against media misogyny will continue to be perceived as a proxy war for the
Democratic Party, not a fight for fair treatment of women in the public
square.
_____________________________________________
Kirsten Powers is a columnist for The Daily Beast. She is also a contributor to
USA Today and a Fox News political analyst. She served in the Clinton
administration from 1993 to 1998 and has worked in New York state and city
politics. Her writing has been published in The Wall Street Journal,
USA Today, New York Post, The New York Observer, Salon.com,
Elle magazine, and American Prospect online.
No comments:
Post a Comment