The President of Contempt
To Barack Obama, America is lovable in proportion to the love it gives him in return.
By: Bret Stephens, WSJ, October 4, 2011
Nixon was tricky. Ford was clumsy. Carter was dour. Reagan was sunny. Bush 41
was prudent. Clinton felt your pain. Bush 43 was stubborn. And Barack Obama is .
. .
Early in America's acquaintance with the man who would become the 44th
president, the word that typically sprang from media lips to describe him was
"cool."
Cool as a matter of fashion sense—"Who does he think he is, George Clooney?"
burbled the blogger Wonkette in April 2008. Cool as a matter of political
temperament—"Maybe after eight years of George W. Bush stubbornness, on the
heels of eight years of Clinton emotiveness, we need to send out for ice,"
approved USA Today's Ruben Navarrette that October. Cool as a matter of
upbringing—Indonesia, apparently, is "where Barack learned to be cool,"
according to a family friend quoted in a biography of his mother.
The Obama cool made for a reassuring contrast with his campaign's
warm-and-fuzzy appeals to hope, change and being the ones we've been waiting
for. But as the American writer Minna Antrim observed long ago, "between
flattery and admiration there often flows a river of contempt." When it comes to
Mr. Obama, boy does it ever.
We caught flashes of the contempt during the campaign. There were those
small-town Midwesterners who, as he put it at a San Francisco fund-raiser,
"cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who are not like them." There
were those racist Republicans who, as he put it at a Jacksonville fund-raiser,
would campaign against him by asking, "Did I mention he's black?" There was the
"you're likable enough, Hillary," line during a New Hampshire debate. But these
were unscripted digressions and could be written off as such.
Only after Mr. Obama came to office did it start to become clear that
contempt would be both a style and method of his governance. Take the "mess we
have inherited" line, which became the administration's ring tone for its first
two years.
"I have never seen anything like the mess we have inherited," said the late
Richard Holbrooke—a man with memories of what Nixon inherited in Vietnam from
Johnson—about Afghanistan in February 2009. "We are cleaning up something that
is—quite simply—a mess," said the president the following month about
Guantanamo. "Let's face it, we inherited a mess," said Valerie Jarrett about the
economy in March 2010.
For presidential candidates to rail against incumbents from an opposing party
is normal; for a president to rail for years against a predecessor of any party
is crass—and something to which neither Reagan nor Lincoln, each of them
inheritors of much bigger messes, stooped.
Then again, the contempt Mr. Obama felt for the Bush administration was
merely of a piece with the broader ambit of his disdain. Examples? Here's a
quick list:
The gratuitous return of the Churchill bust to Britain. The slam of the
Boston police officer who arrested Henry Louis Gates. The high-profile rebuke of
the members of the Supreme Court at his 2010 State of the Union speech. The
diplomatic snubs, petty as well as serious, of Gordon Brown, Benjamin Netanyahu
and Nicolas Sarkozy. The verbal assaults on Wall Street "fat cats" who "caused
the problem" of "10% unemployment." The never-ending baiting of millionaires and
billionaires and jet owners and everyone else who, as Black Entertainment
Television's Robert Johnson memorably put it on Sunday, "tried rich and tried
poor and like rich better."
Now we come to the last few days, in which Mr. Obama first admonished the
Congressional Black Caucus to "stop complainin', stop grumblin', stop cryin',"
and later told a Florida TV station that America was losing its competitive edge
because it "had gotten a little soft." The first comment earned a rebuke from
none other than Rep. Maxine Waters, while the second elicited instant
comparisons to Jimmy Carter's "malaise" speech. They tell us something about the
president's political IQ. They tell us more about his world view.
What is it that Mr. Obama doesn't like about the United States—a country that
sent him hurtling like an American Idol contestant from the obscurity of an
Illinois Senate seat to the presidency in a mere four years?
I suspect it's the same thing that so many run-of-the-mill liberals dislike:
Americans typically believe that happiness is an individual pursuit; we bridle
at other people setting limits on what's "enough"; we enjoy wealth and want to
keep as much of it as we can; we don't like trading in our own freedom for
someone else's idea of virtue, much less a fabricated concept of the collective
good.
When a good history of anti-Americanism is someday written, it will note that
it's mainly a story of disenchantment—of the obdurate and sometimes vulgar
reality of the country falling short of the lover's ideal. Listening to Mr.
Obama, especially now as the country turns against him, one senses in him a
similar disenchantment: America is lovable exactly in proportion to the love it
gives him in return.
Hence his increasingly ill-concealed expressions of contempt. Hence the
increasingly widespread counter-contempt.
Write to bstephens@wsj.com
No comments:
Post a Comment