How in 40 years the Jewish state went from inspiring underdog to supposed oppressor.
By: Michael Oren, WSJ Opinion, May 15, 2012
This year Israel is celebrating . . . a series of accomplishments that
have surely exceeded the expectations of its most visionary founders. It is one
of the most powerful small nations in history. . . . [It] has tamed an arid
wilderness [and] welcomed 1.25 million immigrants. . . . The Israelis themselves
did the fighting, the struggling, the sacrificing in order to perform the
greatest feat of all—forging a new society . . . in which pride and confidence
have replaced the despair engendered by age-long suffering and persecution.
So Life magazine described Israel on the occasion of its 25th birthday in May
1973. In a 92-page special issue, "The Spirit of Israel," the magazine extolled
the Jewish state as enlightened, robustly democratic and hip, a land of
"astonishing achievement" that dared "to dream the dream and make that dream
come alive."
Life told the story of Israel's birth from the Bible through the Holocaust
and the battle for independence. "The Arabs' bloodthirsty threats," the editors
wrote, "lend a deadly seriousness to the vow: Never Again." Four pages
documented "Arab terrorist attacks" and the three paragraphs on the West Bank
commended Israeli administrators for respecting "Arab community leaders" and
hiring "tens of thousands of Arabs." The word "Palestinian" scarcely
appeared.
There was a panoramic portrayal of Jerusalem, described as "the focus of
Jewish prayers for 2,000 years" and the nucleus of new Jewish neighborhoods.
Life emphasized that in its pre-1967 borders, Israel was "a tiny, parched,
scarcely defensible toe-hold." The edition's opening photo shows a father
embracing his Israeli-born daughter on an early "settlement," a testament to
Israel's birthright to the land.
Would a mainstream magazine depict the Jewish state like this today, during
the week of its 64th birthday?
Unlikely. Rather, readers would learn about Israel's overwhelming military
might, brutal conduct in warfare and eroding democratic values—plus the
Palestinians' plight and Israeli intransigence. The photographs would show not
cool students and cutting-edge artists but soldiers at checkpoints and religious
radicals.
Why has Israel's image deteriorated? After all, Israel today is more
democratic and—despite all the threats it faces—even more committed to
peace.
Some claim that Israel today is a Middle Eastern power that threatens its
neighbors, and that conservative immigrants and extremists have pushed Israel
rightward. Most damaging, they contend, are Israel's policies toward the
territories it captured in the 1967 Six-Day War, toward the peace process and
the Palestinians, and toward the construction of settlements.
Israel may seem like Goliath vis-à-vis the Palestinians, but in a regional
context it is David. Gaza is host to 10,000 rockets, many of which can hit Tel
Aviv, and Hezbollah in Lebanon has 50,000 missiles that place all of Israel
within range. Throughout the Middle East, countries with massive arsenals are in
upheaval. And Iran, which regularly pledges to wipe Israel off the map, is
developing nuclear weapons. Israel remains the world's only state that is
threatened with annihilation.
Whether in Lebanon, the West Bank or Gaza, Israel has acted in self-defense
after suffering thousands of rocket and suicide attacks against our civilians.
Few countries have fought with clearer justification, fewer still with greater
restraint, and none with a lower civilian-to-militant casualty ratio. Israel
withdrew from Lebanon and Gaza to advance peace only to receive war in
return.
Whereas Israelis in 1973 viewed the creation of a Palestinian state as a
mortal threat, it is now the official policy of the Israeli government. Jewish
men of European backgrounds once dominated Israel, but today Sephardic Jews,
Arabs and women are prominent in every facet of society. This is a country where
a Supreme Court panel of two women and an Arab convicted a former president of
sexual offenses. It is the sole Middle Eastern country with a growing Christian
population. Even in the face of immense security pressures, Israel has never
known a second of nondemocratic rule.
In 1967, Israel offered to exchange newly captured territories for peace
treaties with Egypt and Syria. The Arab states refused. Israel later evacuated
the Sinai, an area 3.5 times its size, for peace with Egypt, and it conceded
land and water resources for peace with Jordan.
In 1993, Israel recognized the Palestinian people ignored by Life magazine,
along with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the perpetrator of those
"Arab terrorist attacks." Israel facilitated the creation of a Palestinian
Authority in the West Bank and Gaza and armed its security forces. Twice, in
2000 and 2008, Israel offered the Palestinians a state in Gaza, virtually all of
the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. In both cases, the Palestinians refused.
Astonishingly, in spite of the Palestinian Authority's praise for terror, a
solid majority of Israelis still support the two-state solution.
Israel has built settlements (some before 1973), and it has removed some to
promote peace, including 7,000 settlers to fulfill the treaty with Egypt.
Palestinians have rebuffed Israel's peace offers not because of the
settlements—most of which would have remained in Israel anyway, and which
account for less than 2% of the West Bank—but because they reject the Jewish
state. When Israel removed all settlements from Gaza, including their 9,000
residents, the result was a terrorist ministate run by Hamas, an organization
dedicated to killing Jews world-wide.
Nevertheless, Israeli governments have transferred large areas to the
Palestinian Authority and much security responsibility to Palestinian police.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has removed hundreds of checkpoints, eased the
Gaza land blockade and joined President Obama in calling for the resumption of
direct peace talks without preconditions. Addressing Congress, Mr. Netanyahu
declared that the emergence of a Palestinian state would leave some settlements
beyond Israel's borders and that "with creativity and with good will a solution
can be found" for Jerusalem.
Given all this, why have anti-Israel libels once consigned to hate groups
become media mainstays? How can we explain the assertion that an insidious
"Israel Lobby" purchases votes in Congress, or that Israel oppresses Christians?
Why is Israel's record on gay rights dismissed as camouflage for discrimination
against others?
The answer lies in the systematic delegitimization of the Jewish state.
Having failed to destroy Israel by conventional arms and terrorism, Israel's
enemies alit on a subtler and more sinister tactic that hampers Israel's ability
to defend itself, even to justify its existence.
It began with PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat's 1974 speech to the U.N., when he
received a standing ovation for equating Zionism with racism—a view the U.N.
General Assembly endorsed the following year. It gained credibility on college
campuses through anti-Israel courses and "Israel Apartheid Weeks." It burgeoned
through the boycott of Israeli scholars, artists and athletes, and the embargo
of Israeli products. It was perpetuated by journalists who published doctored
photos and false Palestinian accounts of Israeli massacres.
Israel must confront the acute dangers of delegitimization as it did armies
and bombers in the past. Along with celebrating our technology, pioneering
science and medicine, we need to stand by the facts of our past. "The Spirit of
Israel" has not diminished since 1973—on the contrary, it has flourished. The
state that Life once lionized lives even more vibrantly today.
Mr. Oren is Israel's ambassador to the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment