Romney Won
Unequivocally; Obama's Responses Were Petty
On FoxNews last night, CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
I think it's unequivocal, Romney won. And he didn't just
win tactically, but strategically. Strategically, all he needed to do is
basically draw. He needed to continue the momentum he's had since the first
debate, and this will continue it. Tactically, he simply had to get up there and
show that he's a competent man, somebody who you could trust as commander in
chief, a who knows every area of the globe and he gave interesting extra
details, like the Haqqani network, which gave the impression he knows what he's
talking about. But there is a third level here, and that is what actually
happened in the debate.
We can argue about the small points and the
debating points. Romney went large, Obama went very, very small, shockingly
small. Romney made a strategic decision not go after the president on Libya, or
Syria, or other areas where Obama could accuse him of being a Bush-like war
monger. Now I would have gone after Obama on Libya like a baseball bat, but
that's why Romney has won elections and I've never had to even contested them.
He decided to stay away from the and I think that might have actually worked for
him.
What he did concentrate on is the big picture. People don't care
what our policy on Syria is going to be. They care about how America is
perceived in the world and how America carries itself in the world. And the high
point is when he devastatingly leveled the charge of Obama going around the
world on an apology tour. Obama's answer was ask any reporter and they will tell
you it wasn't so. That's about as weak an answer you can get. And Romney's
response to quote Obama saying that, 'we dictate to other nations,' and Romney
said, 'we do not dictate to other nations, we liberate them.' And Obama was
utterly speechless.
So that is the large picture, America is strong and
respecting. What Obama did is he kept interrupting, interjecting and his
responses were almost all very small, petty attacks. The lowest was when he's
talking about sanctions that are old. 'When I was working on sanctions you were
investing in a company in China.' I mean that is the kind of attack you expect
from a guy who is running for city council for the first time, that's not what
you expect from the president. A personal attack about an investment when
talking about Iran?
I thought Romney had the day. He looked
presidential. The president did not. And that's the impression I think that is
going to be left.
MEGYN KELLY, FOX News: Mitt Romney sounded a bit more
dovish, less bellicose than some, perhaps on the right wanted to hear. How will
that play?
KRAUTHAMMER: Well, I think those on the right like me, who
would have loved for him to have been bellicose and love the near fisticuffs
will understand exactly why Romney did it. He stayed away from the pitfalls. He
did not allow himself to be painted as a war monger. This is what Reagan
understood in 1980, he did it extremely well. So Romney did and I think this
could help him win the election.
No comments:
Post a Comment